Back in the early aughts I had a LiveJournal account.
LiveJournal was one of the earlier social media platforms (it still technically
exists, but it’s a fully Russian operation now, and I’m not aware of anyone who
uses it.) LJ functioned more like a blog than anything, but also had a
community aspect. For those of us with wordier tendencies it was a nice
platform, but once Twitter, Facebook, et.al. came on the scene it rapidly became
obsolete for most users. I was a heavy user in my peak years, at one point
writing almost a post a day for my two different journals. I wrote whatever was
on my mind; it really was a journal for me, just one available to the public. I
certainly never had a large readership, and what I did have was mostly
comprised of people I knew in real life or had a connection to.
I certainly didn’t think about what I wrote in terms of
audience. My audience was my friends. So when I wrote a snarky, somewhat
condescending post about The Imago
Sequence, a collection of stories by a new author, Laird Barron, I’d just finished
reading, I didn’t think anything of it. I can’t remember exactly what I wrote,
but it essentially boiled down to: everyone in the field is talking about this
new author, and I can’t figure out why. This collection did nothing for me. I
just don’t get it.
The next day I saw there was a comment on the post from a LJ member
whose name I didn’t recognize. Turns out the member was Laird himself, and I
can quote exactly what he said because I’ve never forgotten it: “Sometimes
there’s nothing to get, you like it or you don’t. Thanks for reading.”
I felt terrible. Never did I think there was a chance
that an author might read something I wrote on my dinky blog. I had no wish to
spread negativity about a writer’s hard work, and I certainly would not have
done so in the condescending, snarky tone that I’d used had I any idea it would
be seen by the author. I thought Laird’s response was spot-on and classy, much
more than I deserved. Whether he intended to or not, he held up a mirror, and I
didn’t like what I saw. Ever since I’ve tried to be much more thoughtful if writing
about something I don’t care for, since all it boils down to is “well, this
didn’t work for me but that doesn’t mean it won’t work for you.” Anything else
is just ego games, right? Keyboard warrior bullshit. Now, I’m not above taking
a crack at a megazillionare like Dan Brown, but even then I recognize that a
lot of people have gotten joy out of Dan Brown’s books and that’s really all
that matters. I don’t want to piss all over their joy, and I do not think
myself any better than them just because we have different taste.
A couple of years after this incident Laird put out a
second collection entitled Occultation.
I wanted to give him another try, and am I glad I did—Occultation is fantastic, definitely one of my favorite books of
2011. Once I finished it, I went back and re-read The Imago Sequence. This time I did get it, finding the collection to be fresh and original, with a powerful
and startling voice. I wondered why it had not hit me the first time. Was it a
timing thing? Was I just not in the right headspace? Laird’s best stories worm
their way into you. They often don’t grant instant gratification, and perhaps
at the time I simply couldn’t wrap my head around them. He’s certainly been one
of the most important voices in the field for the last decade-plus, and one whose
work I hold in high esteem and derive great pleasure from.
With so many books out there to read, it’s easy to write
something off if it doesn’t hit you immediately. Most of the time that’s not a
bad practice, but I’m sure I’ve missed out on some great work over the years by
not giving it a second chance. Circumstances play into reading almost as much as
taste, and circumstances are always changing.
I’m grateful that Laird left a comment that day. It was a
turning point and a teaching moment. The internet is massive, but you still
never know who might be reading. If it’s not something I’d say to the person in
real life, it’s not something I’ll write in cyberspace. I’m beyond tired of snark
and condescending tones, and I truly hope I’ve grown beyond that. In that simple,
two-sentence reply, Laird taught me how a real author should conduct oneself.
It’s a lesson I’ve never forgotten.
No comments:
Post a Comment